As the movie sheds light on the secret way of the pope

The 2024 film is the hit of the box office and the Oscar winner – it tells about the papal elections, which have no obvious favorites. For many people, it was an imagination in the Vatican’s sparse world and a very secret process of choosing the leader of the Roman Catholic Church.

On Wednesday, May 7, life follows fiction when 134 cardinals begin the process of choosing the successor of Pope Francis. According to the movie viewers, the papal conclave will take place completely behind the closed doors of the Sistine chapel, under its world -renowned Michelangelo murals.

Nobody knows the results until the plume of white smoke kitchens from the chimney, which means that there is no new leader in the Roman Catholic Church.

But what does the movie tell us how the conclaph can turn around, and why do people consider this process so entertaining?

The end, adapted from the best-selling novel Robert Harris, shows that the cardinal-electricians identify themselves within the Vatican during the election process.

They are forbidden to communicate with anyone’s boundaries -though, given practicality, they are not completely cut off.

“They all need feeding, they are not completely sealed from the world,” says Stephen Bulivlad, Professor of Theology and Sociology of Religion at Saint -Mary University, Tvikenham.

This independent isolation is a tradition that has been going on for hundreds of years.

In part, it is aimed at preventing external factors under the influence of voters, although the idea of ​​the process that occurs behind closed doors may disperse with the modern world “concentration on transparency, visibility and control”, reports Anna Rowland, professor of Catholic social opinion and practice at the University of Darem.

The film causes “incredible, intrauterine atmosphere” and a sense of exit from the world, she says. “I try to think of more intense responsibility and feeling than to be closed in a conclave.”

The screen has claustrophobic and intense reflections, strategic here and tactical steps. One cardinal undermines the leadership to improve your chances. Others with the unlikely prospects urge their fans to change their voice.

This conflict of interest and competing ideologies provides most of the film drama. “It is about political fraud,” Nick Emerson, the movie editor, said BBC earlier this year.

While some cardinals will believe that the most important part is performing the Divine leadership, others will be alarming with a quick decision, says Tina Beati, a professor at Catholic studies at Rampan University.

Considering that Pope Francis’ health was bad for a while, it is likely that before Kancov “would be a lot of politics and recruiting for the position,” she adds.

“There will be all these fuss, and (the cardinals) will not be the whole mind.”

Despite the fact that in the film some of the most popular scenes are focused on acts of voting, in reality, most drama may come at the meeting on the days before the conclave officially begins.

During this time, the participants will “get acquainted with, developing what priorities and learn how to work together as a body so that they can come up with a single solution,” says Professor Rowland, who is approaching the end of the two-year press to the Vatican.

The film is unknown by the cardinal – a secretly appointed late Pope – catapulted into a fight.

In real life it would be impossible. Despite the fact that any baptized Roman -Catholic man could theoretically be made by the Pope, all the cardinals who vote in the conclave had to appoint publicly the previous Pope.

Having said this, a quick election may be One of the most unpredictable out there. About 80% of the voting cardinals have been appointed by Pope Francis over the last 12 years. He deliberately chose people from all over the world and with various political origin.

Many of the appointed Frances come from the developing world – “places and contexts that do not usually give Red Hat,” says Professor Rowland.

This adds the level of uncertainty regarding their priorities and the final decision.

The film presents cardinals as erroneous people seeking power.

Director Edward Berger said BBC last year While the conclave was considered “ancient spiritual ritual”, he wanted to bring participants “into the present”.

“We put them on this pedestal, and if you look closer, they will have mobile phones, they will smoke, they have the same problems, vices and secrets as we do.”

Professor Rowland says that the film provides a peak of process with all the elements of human nature and human life in it: “Loss. Woe, ambition, fear, temptation, courage.”

She adds: “This is a very, very human thing, a conclave … It has a divine goal, but it is a very human thing.”