Amazon Tribe sues the New York Times in history.

The Amazon tribe sued for The New York Times (NYT) for a report on a community that has access to the speed internet, which, he said, led to its participants marked as addicts.

The defamation lawsuit states that the US newspaper report reflected the Maruba tribe as “unable to cope with the main exposition on the Internet” and emphasized the allegations that their youth consumed pornography. ”

The trial was also called TMZ and Yahoo to the defendants and said that their news “mocked their youth” and “incorrectly presented their traditions”.

Nyt said he did not say that none of the members of the tribe was fond of porn. TMZ and Yahoo turned to the comments.

Marubas, the indigenous community of about 2000 people, is looking for a loss of at least $ 180 million (133 million pounds).

NYT story, written nine months after Marubo gained access to Starlink, Satellite Network Satellite Elon Musk said that the tribe is already fighting with the same problems that have been thwarted for many years. “

These included “teens glued to phones”, “violent video games” and “minors who are watching pornography,” the report said.

It states that the leader of the community and the vocal critic of the Internet was “the most unresolved pornography” and he was told about “more aggressive sexual behavior” from young people.

The report also noted the perceived advantages of the Internet among the tribe, including the opportunity to prevent power about health problems and destruction of the environment and keep in touch with the distant family.

The lawsuit claims that other information expenses have sensationalized the NYT report, including the tmz title, citing addiction porn.

The answer led NYT to launch The following report About a week after his original story with the headline: “No, the remote Amazon tribe was not fond of porn.”

The report states that “more than 100 sites around the world” has published headlines that claim that the maruba began to admire porn. “

But the lawsuit claimed that the original NYT story “reflected the people of Marubas as a community that was unable to cope with the main exposition on the Internet, emphasizing the allegations that their youth consumed pornography.”

Named plaintiffs, the leader of the Enque Marubo community and the Brazilian Flora Dutra activist, who helped spread $ 20,000 Antennas Starlink to the tribe, stated that NYT history helped to flow “world brown media,” the court news service reports.

According to them, they were subjected to “humiliation, persecution and irreparable damage to their reputation and security.”

TMZ history included video materials about the Marubas and Dutters spreading antennas, which, according to them, “created an unmistakable impression (they) introduced harmful, sexual materials and contributed to the alleged moral and social decay.”

The New York Times press -secretary said: “Any fair reading of this work shows a tangible and nuanced study of the preferences and complications of new technologies in a remote indigenous village with a proud history and preserved culture.

“We intend to actively defend against the trial.”