After 100 days in office, the peaceful transaction of Ukraine-Russian is evaded from Trump

Prior to winning the presidential election last fall, Donald Trump It boasted gloriously that it could end the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day.

During the first tone of the 100 days of Trump’s second presidency, having reached the ceasefire agreement, which respects both sides, not speaking about a peace treaty, perhaps much more difficult than the White House leader.

Trump returned his initial comments about the quick termination of the three -year conflict.

“Well, I said it figuratively and I said as an exaggeration because to make sense”, Last week Trump told Time magazine. “Obviously, people know that when I said it, it was said in a joke, but it was also said that (war) would be over.”

For the sake of justice of the Trump administration, It did not spend time initiating discussions with Russia and then with UkraineSeeking to conclude a ceasefire agreement that can lead to peace talks. So far, there was no real progress in this ball.

Negotiations continue between the US and the teams from Kiev and Moscow, but last week Washington threatened to quit negotiations unless there were rapid signs of a compromise. The warring parties continue to accuse each other of the Subtaging Agreement on the Fire and without respecting the US export agreement, so as not to focus on the relevant energy infrastructure.

US Secretary of State Mark Rubio said Sunday that next week would be “very critical” for the White House Because it does “determination as to whether it is (talking to the ceasefire) in which we want to continue to participate.”

“There are reasons to be optimistic, but there are reasons to be realistic,” Rubio said, adding, “We are close, but we’re not close enough.”

Russia and Ukraine continue to trade unmanned and missile attacks, conducting some negotiations with the US Hope in Kiev to restore pre -war territorial sovereignty last week when the United States appeared on the side with Russia that Ukraine could take a loss of occupied territory, such as a criminal case.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin insists that this is serious about the peaceful deal, and the press -secretary Dmitry Peskov, who tells the journalists on Monday that while Russia’s war on Ukraine is continuing, so make the US efforts to transfer the process on a peaceful way. “

“The President (Vladimir Putin) has repeatedly confirmed the readiness of the Russian side (Vladimir Putin).

Tina Fordham, founder of the Fordham Global foresight, noted that this when a week was issued as another period of “make a violation” for diplomacy in the Russian conflict, she did not see the reason for optimism in the resolution of the war.

“It’s easy to start wars, it’s hard to stop them,” she said on Monday, “Squawk Box Europe” CNBC.

“Both sides will tell President Trump that they want to conclude peace because it’s what Trump wants to hear. But Putin’s advantage is to keep the status as long as possible,” Fordham said.

“I think we see that President Trump is very upset,” she added. “Remember that he promised peace on the first day, and also that he really wants the Nobel Peace Prize. And Vladimir Putin has never rushed to conclude peace. And the circumstances really play in Russia.”

But Trump also suggested that Zelenskyy was ready to consider that Moscow had joined in 2014, as part of the transaction, the “red line”, which the Ukrainian leader had previously refused to cross. Asked by journalists on Sunday, he thought that the Ukrainian president was ready to abandon the peninsula, Trump replied, “I think yes.”

Zelensky meanwhile said BBC on Friday The fact that there is no weapon in his countries to return control over the Crimean peninsula “and” complete and unconditional ceasefire opens the opportunity to discuss everything. “

From Russia, The Kremlin said on Saturday that Putin was ready for direct negotiations with Ukraine without pre -preparation. European diplomats remain skeptical.

Kaj Kalas, the head of the European Union’s foreign policy, said on Monday CNBC that Russia did not show that he wanted peace, given his attacks on civil infrastructure in Ukraine in recent weeks. Russia has denied such hostilities against civil purposes in the war, despite many blows.

“We know very well that Ukraine wants peace, and we need two to want peace, just need to want war, and we see that Russia does not want peace,” Kalas said in Sylvia Amar CNBC.

“Russia is the one that bombard the civilian and civilian infrastructure, while Ukraine agreed to the unconditional ceasefire during a month ago. Therefore, we need to see more pressure on Russia so that Russia also wanted peace,” she said, adding that BLOC position was clear.

“International law is very clear: Crimea is Ukraine, and I think if Crimea is distributed, the result is that it will simply crack the aggressors, because it pays off to change the borders,” she said.

Oleksa Goncherenko, an independent Ukrainian legislator, said on Monday that “Russia and Putin is the only obstacle to peace because it does not want peace. We, Ukrainians, we want peace as soon as possible.”

However, he agreed that there could be a place for maneuver when it comes to reaching a ceasefire while Russia still occupies Ukrainian land.

“Ukraine never recognizes any inch of our territory as a Russian, but hostilities can end in actual control over the Russians part of our territories that will be illegally occupied. Unfortunately, this is not the first case in the history of the world, and probably not the last,” he said “Europe Early edition” on Monday.

“One day the Russian Empire will fall apart as it happened before, and we will take them (territory) back. But at the moment we cannot expel the Russians from our territories. But once again we will recognize them as Russian. And it must be absolutely clear,” he said.