According to the message

Australia may use a number of technologies to implement the ban on social media for up to 16 years, but all have risks or disadvantages, the report said.

The government states that its ban, which comes into force in December, is intended to limit the harmful consequences of social media. Politics is advertised as the world’s first and closely monitoring worldwide leaders.

According to new laws, the platforms must take “smart steps” in order to prevent children from Australia create accounts on their sites and deactivate existing ones.

Although this step is popular with many parents, experts have caused concern about the privacy and accuracy of the age of checking.

The Federal Government has ordered an age certification scheme to verify Australia, and its final report was published on Sunday.

He considered different methods – including official checks using state documents, parental approval or technology to determine age based on the structure of the individual, gestures and behavior – and everything was technically possible.

“But we did not find a single ubiquitous solution that would correspond to all use, and we did not find solutions that were guaranteed effective in all deployments,” the statement reads.

Checking using identity documents has been given as the most accurate method, but the report revealed the concern that the platforms can keep this data longer than required and waited to share it with the regulators, both of them would leave the risk of users’ privacy.

In Australia – like most of the world – in recent years there have been a number of high -profile data violations, including several, where personal information was stolen and sold.

The personality assessment technology was 92% accurate for people aged 18, but there is a “buffer zone” – about two to three years of both sides 16 – in which it is less. The report states that this will lead to false positives, cleaning children for accounts and false negatives that prohibit users to allow.

There are also problems of privacy and accuracy with the methods of approval of parents, the report said.

It is recommended that the methods be “layered” to create the most reliable system, and emphasize that many technology providers are considering ways to resolve through things such as fake documents and VPN (virtual private networks) that obscure the user’s country.

Anika Wells Minister said “there was no decision for a single size” that the report shows that age checks could be “private, effective and effective.”

“These are some of the richest companies in the world. They are in the forefront of the II. They use the data that we give them for commercial purposes. I think it is reasonable to ask them to use the same data and technology to save children online,” she said on Monday to journalists.

“There are no excuses for platforms in social media, so as not to have a combination of age providing their platforms ready by December 10.”

According to the ban, technology companies can fined up to $ 50 million ($ 32.5 million. These steps still need to be determined.

Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube are among the platforms.

The poll shows that most adults in Australia support the ban on social media for children under 16.

However, some mental health fans say the policy has the potential to disable children from communication, while others say they can push children up to 16-year-old corners of the Internet.

They believe the government should focus on improving the protection of harmful content on social media platforms and the preparation of children for reality on the Internet.