The UAE warns Israel that the Western shore joining the “red line”

The United Arab Emirates warned Israel that the annexed western shore crosses the “red line” and undermines Abraham’s spirit, which has normalized relations between the two countries.

A high Emirate official, Lana Nussebe, said that such a step would be the death of a two-state decision of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Palestinian Administration has stated that the UAE position welcomed.

The Israeli government has not commented. But Nussebe’s remarks came after the Finance Minister Lesal Smotrich submitted an annexation proposal for about four -fifths of the western shores.

Israel built about 160 settlements living 700,000 Jews, as it occupied the western shore and eastern Jerusalem – Palestinians who want, together with Gaza, for the hope for the future – during the 1967 war. Approximately 3.3 million Palestinians live near them.

Settlements are illegal in accordance with international law.

In Abraham 2020, which were initiated in the United States, the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco have established complete diplomatic relations with Israel.

One of the UAE key conditions for signing was that the previous Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stopped his plans on the Western Bank questionnairesincluding settlements and valley of Jordan. Netanyahu at the time said he agreed to “suspend” plans, but they remained “on the table”.

Many ministers in his right and seat management coalition have long advocated the dating of a part or the whole west shore. But as reported Admire the Palestine condition This month.

Netanyahu said he recognizes statehood as a result Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023The war that caused the war will be a “reward for terrorism”.

The UAE is one of the 147 UN member states that already recognize the Palestine state.

“From the very beginning, we considered (Abraham) an agreement as a way to provide our constant support from the Palestinian people and their legal desire for an independent state,” said Nussebe, Assistant Minister for Political Affairs.

She added: “Annexation on the west shore will be a red line for the UAE.

“It greatly undermines the vision and spirit (tariffs), end the desire for regional integration and change the widely general consensus about what the trajectory of this conflict should be – two states living near peace, prosperity and security.”

Earlier, Smatrich is an ultra -nationalist leader and a settler who has control over the planning on the Western Bank – he told at a press conference in Jerusalem that “time came” for the annexation.

“The idea to share the country and the creation of a terrorist state in its center should be delayed from the table once and for all,” he added.

He presented a map, which, he said, showed the proposal of the administration of the Ministry of Defense for the “application of Israeli sovereignty” to about 82% of the territory, which, he said, corresponded to the principle of “maximum land with minimal Arabs”.

The remaining 18% of the territory consisted of isolated enclaves of about six Palestinian cities – Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus, Ramalo, Jerichon and Hibran.

Bethlehem was among many other Palestinian cities, towns and villages that are not included, while Israel was already annexed by Israel in 1980, during the overwhelming majority of the international community.

Smatrich said that the Palestinians would “continue to manage their own lives, in the near future that it is done today through the Palestinian authorities, and then through regional alternatives to civilian government.”

According to the western shore, not under the full Israeli control, stated that the plan of the Smatrich was a “immediate threat” on the hope of a Palestinian state.

Jehuda Shaul from the Center for the Center, the Analytical Center, which agitates for the cessation of Israel’s occupation, sent a map of the smatrich on X and wrote: “reminds me of another map on another continent, since the 20th century.

A number of international human rights groups have come to the conclusion that Israel is already running the apartheid system on the western shore – a characteristic that the Israeli government has rejected.

Last month, a wave of international indignation occurred after the Israeli government approved the plans presented by the spat The main project of calculations in the E1 areaWhatever effectively cut off the western shore from East Jerusalem and divide the territory by two.

In 2024, the International Court issued an advisory conclusion saying that “the permanent presence of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory is illegal” and that the country is obliged to finish its illegal presence … as soon as possible. “

At the time, Netanyahu stated that the court made a “decision”.