Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Main coach of the western Indies Daren sammy He has faced the disciplinary action of the International Cricket Council (ICC), receiving a fined and a weather after openly criticizing the third referee’s decision during the First test against Australia in BridgetownBarbados. The incident, which was deployed during the game on the 2nd, saw that the former Captain of the West Indies expressed important concerns about a series of controversial decisions that went against his team.
Sammy’s hot statements to journalists highlighted their frustration with what he perceived as inconsistent standards, directing specifically to the field of television. Adrian Holdstock. He publicly questioned whether the official had a bias against the West Indies, a feeling born of a series of controversial sentences throughout the party. His comments were quickly attention, leading to immediate CPI investigation.
As a direct consequence of his actions, the charismatic coach has been issued a 15 percent sentence of his match share. In addition to the monetary sanction, Sammy has also incorporated a duty to disciplinary record. This measure underlines the strict position of the ICC to maintain the integrity of party officials and defend the code of conduct.
Daren Sammy violates the Code of Conduct of the ICC
ICC confirmed it Sammy It was found to comply with article 2.7 of the Code of Conduct of the ICC. This particular article refers to “Public criticism or inappropriate comment on an incident that occurs in an international game or any player, players’ support staff, party officer or team participating in any international match.” The ruling emphasizes the responsibility of individuals in the leadership positions within the cricket to abstain from the public comments that could undermine the authority or the impartiality of officials.
Sammy’s outbreak was triggered by a television referee’s sentence pattern, which included at least five highly debatable decisions during the first two days of the test. Undoubtedly, these controversial calls had a material impact on the flow of the game, which can influence the result against the domestic team.
Although the frustration of coaches and players is understandable, the ICC remains firm in its policy to protect the sanctity of office and the global image of the sport. The Western Indies team will continue the series with its coach with a demeral point, a factor that could lead to more severe penalties if there are more breaches in the future.
Sammy justification: Questions Consistency of the
Sammy, directing to the media after the day’s game, Sammy articulated the desire of the team of greater coherence in practice. “You will not want to put -in a situation where you ask yourself about certain areas. Is there something against this team?” Sammy stated, without leaving his concerns. The 41 -year -old elaborated even more, “But when you see the decision after the decision, you ask the question. I know it’s here for the series. You don’t want to go into a test game with this doubt.”
The coach also revealed that his apprehension of Holdstock’s office was not new, suggesting that a perceived pattern extended to the West Indies series against England. This story, according to Sammy, promoted its public questioning about the referee’s decisions and consistency.
