Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
It England in front of India The test series began with high intensity and drama, and it did not take long for tensions to spill in the field. The third day of the headingley test, Rishabh pantIndia star Wicketkeeper-Batter, found himself on the wrong side of the law after an emotional reaction to a wide decision.
Rishabh Pant’s animated behavior during the first entrances of England
The time of the controversy took place during the 61st in the first entrances of England. Wide in the countryside Paul Ferl and Chris gaffaney He conducted a routine ball inspection by means of a caliber to check any loss in shape. Although these checks are standard in longer format cricket, the Umpires decided that the ball did not need to replace.
Pant, apparently disgusted by the call, reacted by throwing the ball On Earth in visible frustration: An act that was considered disrespectful to officials.
Also read: 5 Indian Bathedors elite List with twin centuries out of Ris Habh Pant
Why did Pant repress?
Pant’s behavior was classified as a breach of the ICC Code of Conduct, specifically in article 2.8, which belongs to the dissent shown in the decision of a referee. In a quick response, the ICC issued an official reproach in Pant. According to the declaration published by the governing body, the Indian player accepted the responsibility of his actions and agreed to the sanction proposed by the party referee Richie Richardson, thus avoiding the need for a formal hearing.
“The Rishab Pant of India has been delivered an official reproach for breaching level 1 of the CPI Code of Conduct on the third day of the first test against England in Headingley.” The declaration read.
The disciplinary action includes a demento point added to the record of Pant, its first since its international debut. According to the Rules of the ICC, level 1 crimes are usually a minimum penalty, ranging from a reproach to a fine of up to 50% of the match share, along with one or two dienches.
The post was presented by the whole party officials: Reiffel and Gaffaney (wide in the field), SharfudDoula Ibne Shahid (TV wide) and Mike Burns (fourth referee). His collective observation of Pant’s behavior left little ambiguity in the evaluation.
