Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
US President Donald Trump has assembled the opportunity to change the leadership in Iran after his country entered Israel in nuclear nuclear facilities.
On Sunday, Trump posted on social media to ask: “Why wouldn’t the regime change ???”
His statements occurred after other major US officials emphasized that the Iranian leaders were not the purpose of the hostilities on Saturday, during which the US bombers sent three sites to reduce Tehran’s nuclear program.
Earlier, Trump criticized the US participation in foreign conflicts, including in Iraq, where the US and its allies dumped Saddam Hussein’s regime in 2003.
On Sunday’s message, Trump wrote: “Not politically properly use this term” regime “term, but if the current Iranian regime cannot make Iran again big, why not change the regime ???”
He seemed to disagree with his main allies. Last weekend, Defense Minister Pitt Hugset stated that “the mission was not and was not in a change of regime” – a message repeated by the Vice President of J. D. Vens.
Trump’s mail has caused a flurry of speculation, but one of his former officials asked how serious it needs to be perceived.
Elliot Abrams, who was an American envoy in Iran during the first Trump presidency, said the BBC Radio 4 program today had a lot of “wrong direction” and that Trump could just “joke around”.
On Saturday, strikes on three individual Iran’s sites from the United States took place after a week of hostilities between Israel and Iran, caused by the efforts of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin to destroy the Iran’s nuclear program.
Both Netanyahu and Trump have expressed fears that Tehran is approaching the potential with which can build nuclear weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied it.
Trump says strikes – used by American “Bunker -Bunker” with high -tech bombs to attack underground infrastructure – have inflicted “monumental damage”. However, the scale of destruction is not yet clear.
The UN Nuclear Caler called for ceasefire to allow the check.
Iran fiercely replied, promising what he calls “eternal consequences”.
On Monday morning, Israeli military said the missiles were launching from Iran to Israel. It also said he attacked six airports in Iran.
In the Middle East there are 40,000 US soldiers at the bases and warships, which are now highly ready because officials supported revenge from Iran. The US State Department also issued a global warning by advising US citizens around the world to carry out great care.
Iranian state television reported that the country’s parliament also approved the measure of closure of the mountains – a narrow route, which is crucial for trade.
Such a step can have serious consequences for global trade, as almost a quarter of world oil and gas go through it. US Secretary of State Mark Rubio has called on China to prevent Iran’s closure.
Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Minister went to Moscow to meet Russian President Putin to talk about his “common problems and threats”.
Last year, the weekend attacks occurred after Trump repeatedly declared an investigator’s mark that the US should not participate in what he called “forever wars.”
In September, he said: “We will soon return stability in the Middle East. And we will return the world to peace.”
But supporters of republican presidents and opposition Democrats noted that his recent actions in Iran could return the US to wars in the Middle East.
Congressman Thomas Massi, Republican from Kentucky, called Trump’s actions “unconstitutional”.
“When the two countries bomb each other daily in the hot war, and the third country joins the bombing, it is an act of war,” the masses in the social media wrote, arguing the president, had to achieve approval in the congress before participating.
Last week, before Trump’s intervention, Vnes said he understood why people were worried that America had joined in Iran “after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy,” but he claimed that Trump “deserved confidence in this issue.”
In the obvious confession of isolationist parties in his party, Vens added: “When I see it close and personally, I can assure you that (Trump) is only interested in using US military personnel to achieve US people.”
