Judge calls Apple to decide the Fortnite application after the ruling

Apple Must work out its latest questions with Epic Games either return to court to prove that it has a legal basis for delay recovery popular game Fortnite to iOS Shop appThe judge ordered on Monday.

Fortnite Recently re -held his game but was blocked by Apple, Epic Games said on Friday. Later, the company addressed a petition for a preliminary ban on court.

US District Judge Ivon Gonzalez Rogers wrote on Monday that “Apple is quite capable of solving this issue without additional briefing and hearings.”

If companies do not resolve the current conflict on its own, the judge wrote: “An official of the apple, who personally is responsible for ensuring the fulfillment of the requirements personally” at the future hearing in the North California district, is scheduled for May 27.

On Friday, Apple said it did not remove Fortnite from alternative distribution markets.

CNBC turned to Apple and Epic Games for comments.

Monday CEO Epic Games Tim SIIIN said in pillar On x that “Apple did not accept or rejected our Fortnite submission. They just said they were going to ignore it until after the Rules of the 9th District Court at their request, which will be in late May or June.”

In order on Monday, Rogers said that after 12 days the Appeal Court of the Ninth District Court has not yet granted Apple to stop the ban.

“The briefing is due to be scheduled below, and includes a legal authority on which Apple claims that he may ignore the order of this court,” the judge wrote.

Initially, Apple removed Fortnite from its app store in 2020 and stopped the App Store Epic Games account after the developer used direct payment technology in its game that Apple did not allow.

This removal started a legal dispute between Epic Games and Apple, which was originally accepted in 2021 regarding iPhone The Maker Platform and how it pays and limits applications developers.

While Apple prevailed, the decision made the campaign to implement limited changes in its policy, which excludes, in accordance with California law.

At the end of April, Rogers led that Apple’s Vice President Alex Raman lied to court when Apple decided to raise a 27% fee for some purchases outside the app store. According to her decree in this case, it was expected that the purchase outlets would not be reduced for Apple.

Apple said it would be appeal.

From this ruling, Hold and Amazon Kindle re -conducted its applications to ensure Purchasing customers By the application store. Apple has already approved these applications.

Cnbc Like a staircase They contributed to this article.