What to know about the case of the MEENDEZ brothers and if they could be released

In 1989, the Lale brothers and Eric Menendez killed their parents, taking them several times at the close distance in their mansion in Beverly -Hills.

They were found guilty of first-degree murder and conspiracy in 1996 and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

On Tuesday, Judge Los -Angeles reduced the punishment that made their parole.

Following the new Netflix drama, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez was released a new Netflix drama that was released after the new Netflix drama: The Lole and Erik Menendez.

Last year, the previous district prosecutor Los -Angeles George Gaskon demanded to change the verdict of the brothers from life without the possibility of parole to 50 years of life.

The hearing was brought to the Judge of the Supreme Court of the Los -Andgeles District Michael Jessic on Tuesday, who offended the brothers.

“I believe that they have done enough over the last 35 years to get this chance,” he said, concluding a daily hearing.

The brothers have the right to parole in accordance with the youth offender California, who allows people who committed crimes up to 26 years to seek a decreased punishment.

At the time, the siblings were 18 and 21. Now they are 54 and 57 years old.

During the hearings, family members and a former prisoner were one of those who testified in support of the cliff.

People who worked with the brothers in prison talked about the training courses they passed, and how they created the hospice initiative for the elderly and the sick.

The district prosecutor’s office, which brutally opposes the lower punishment, said the brothers continue to “justify” for their behavior, not to take full responsibility and did not rehabilitate.

The brothers made a court through the video and apologized for their actions.

They also spoke about their hopes for work with victims of sexual abuse and help those who got rid of when they were given a second chance outside the prison.

The California Council on Parish Liberation decide whether the brothers should be released from prison.

Separately, Governor Govin Newsom is considering a request for a pardon. If this is approved, it can lead to a decrease in sentence or pardon.

The Governor Newsom demanded that the Card Parish Liberation have a risk assessment whether the brothers could risk the general public.

The full report was not published, but the district prosecutor said it indicates a “moderate risk of violence”.

Listening to the Council of Parish Parrier -Parrier -Parrier -Parrier -Parrier -Parrier -Parrier Parole Parole Parole Parish Speed ​​Parole and Parole.

It is unclear whether the council will also consider parole on the basis of the fairness of Judge Jessic at the same hearing.

Lale and Eric Menendez killed their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, on August 20, 1989 at their home in Bverly -Hills.

Their father, a 45-year-old Hollywood leader, was shot six times with a gun, which the brothers purchased a few days before the attack.

Their mother died after receiving 10 shot blasts into several parts of her body.

Initially, the brothers told the police that they found their parents dead when they arrived home.

They were arrested after a psychologist who treated Eric Menendeza, went to the police to say he was physically threatening the doctor.

The brothers claimed that they had committed murder in self -defense after many years of physical, emotional and sexual abuse, although it was never proved in court that the court had never been proven.

They said they were afraid that their father would kill them after threatening them.

However, the prosecutor’s office claimed that the young people killed their successful parents to inherit their multimillion -dollar estate.

The brothers were taken into custody in 1990, and in 1993 they were tried for murders, for the first time with one jury for each brother.

However, both jurors were stalled in 1994, resulting in communication, and couples were later tested in 1995.

During the joint trial, the judge ruled out obvious evidence of abuse from his defense. The inscriptions with the doctor discussing the murder were recognized as permissible in court.

The jury found them guilty, and the couple were convicted of the first degree murder and conspiracy in the 1996 murder.

The brothers who were divided during the detention after the detective, who investigated the killings, said they could turn to the escape when they were put together in jail in 2018.

The case was drawn in the spotlight after Netflix released a dramatic series about the brothers.

Monsters: The story of Lail and Eric Menendez, shot on the top of the platform streaming schedule and, reportedly, over the weekend had 12.3 million views.

He explores what could lead to siblings to kill his parents, and this presents murder from different perspectives.

Its creators said the series was based on extensive research and implies murder events.

This includes brothers ‘claims about abuse and show things from the parents’ perspective.

The show presented the case with the new generation and caught the attention of celebrities – including Kim Kardashian and Rosie O’Donnell, who called for the release of the brothers.

The series became the next controversial series of the first monster about US serial killer Jeffrey Damer.

After his release, Eric Menendez shared a statement released by his wife.

He said the show was a “horrific slander” and he “believed that we went beyond the lie and destroyed Laila’s images.”

“I am sad to know that the dishonest reflection of the Netflix tragedy that surround our crime made painful truths a few steps back – back during the era, when the persecution built a story about the system of beliefs that men were not sexual violence, and that men survived a rape injury differently than women,” he added.

Family members also spoke and stated that the brothers were “donated by this grotesque shcado” and the show was “imbued with Mistruths”.

Ryan Murphy who created the show, – said the diversity that the comments were “predictable at best”.

He added that the family’s response was “interesting because I would like to specify that, in their opinion, shockingly or not shocking. It is not like we do something. That was all presented before.”