Apple says that a contempt for epic games can cost “a significant sum”

Apple The court asks the court to stop the recent decision in its case against the Epic Games and allow the iPhone manufacturer to subsequently charge the application commission that resorts to payment.

Last month, US District Judge Ivon Gonzalez Rogers in Auckland found that Apple violated her initial court ruling with Epic trial, originally taken in 2021What made Apple do Limited changes in his binding policies According to the California law.

Judge Rogers’s new ruling is broader, ordering Apple immediately stop the commission commissions made for iPhone applications through web -monsters in their applications, among other changes.

Apple is now looking for this order, as well as another in the case that prevents it from limiting the design of the language application or placement of these links until all the solution can be appealed. Apple says the necessary changes in their current form will cost “significant sums”.

“This is the latest section in a largely unsuccessful Epic effort to use the competition law to change the way Apple works in the app store,” Apple said in a crash. This movement provides a preliminary order in the event that it turned out that the new binding policy will cost an apple “hundreds of millions to billion” annually.

If Apple succeeds, it will allow the company to abandon the changes that have already begun to change the application development economy. Developers, including Amazon and Hold They were able to update their applications to avoid Apple commissions and send customers to their own web -site for payment.

Prior to Amazon’s Kindle, the resolution told users that they could not purchase a book in the iPhone app. After a recent update, the app now shows the Orange “Get a Book” button that refers to Amazon.

Epic also plans Enter the new software To allow app developers and games, it is easy to resort to their websites to take payments.

“It makes Apple compete,” said Epic Games CEO Tim Sinini shortly after the decision of the last month. “That’s what we wanted all the time.”

Apple’s submission has stated that “non -partisan developers are already seizing the order to reduce consumers (and damage the Apple business), among other things, preventing the use of” purchases in the application.

Rogers have committed a criminal case in the case, saying that Apple was misleading in court and that the Vice President of the Company “Immediately lied“About when and why Apple has decided to charge 27% for external payments. The real decision, according to the judge Tim Cook.

Apple’s supply on Wednesday does not appeal to Rogers allegations that the company misled the judge, but it claims that the ruling was punitive. Apple’s lawyers also claimed that civil contempt can only force the existing order rather than punish the requirements.

Apple said she appealed to the contempt of the court earlier this week.

“We have fulfilled the court order and we are going to appeal,” Cook told investors in the company’s sunset last week.

See: Apple says it strongly disagrees with the Epic Games solution