As Canada’s Conservatives threw out 27-point to lose again

Conservatives in Canada trade the fault for the loss of elections on Monday, showing that Pierre Puliver will need to heal a division in motion when he fights to remain a leader.

Since the night of the election there was a clear liberal victory, conservative candidates and their supporters had one question: what the hell just happened?

The party lost its excellent 27-point preference in polls and did not receive the elections for the fourth consecutive time.

And although he acquired the places and earned almost 42% of the popular vote – its highest share after the party was founded in 2003, its leader Pyulieur was voted from the place he had held over the last 20 years.

“None of this is satisfied,” said the BBC Shakir Chambers, a conservative strategist and Vice President of the Oyster Group Advisory Firm Based in Ontario.

Now the party is trying to find out how it will move forward.

At the top of the agenda will find a way of conservatives to fulfill their duties as an official opposition – the second party in the Canada Parliament, the task of which is to hold the report that is reporting – without their leader in the House of Representatives.

On the eve of the Cocus meeting next Tuesday, to discuss this, on Friday, Pulievore announced his plan to run in a special election to Alberta constituency to return the place.

This special election will be launched by the conservative resignation elected by MP Demien Kurek, who said he would voluntarily go to release Puliver after he called a “excellent national company”.

“The movement does not stop under his leadership, and I know that we need the fight Pierre in the House of Commons,” Kurek said in a statement.

Unlike the US, federal politicians in Canada should not live in the city or province in which they work. However, Pyulieur grew up in Albert, and probably wins, because the constituency in which he is engaged is a conservative support.

A big question is whether Pyliver has supporting his own party to remain a leader. Mr. Chambers said the answer is still loud.

“Pierre has great support in the coacus,” he said. “I don’t think there is anyone who wants it to be removed, or it has super high ambitions who want to replace it as a leader.”

A number of high -profile conservatives have already been rallied behind. One of them is Andrew Sheer, the current MP and the former party leader who said Puliverle should remain to “make sure we finish work the next time.”

Others consider the guilt where they went wrong.

Jamil Givani, who won his own constituency in the suburb of Toronto, felt that the leader of Ontario Doug Ford had betrayed the conservative movement and cost the party in the elections.

Federal and provincial conservative parties are legally different organizations, although they belong to one ideological tent, and Ford is the leader of the progressive Conservative party Ontario.

He often did headlines during the election campaign for his attitude to Donald Trump and the US President’s trade war.

“He couldn’t stay on the borders of our business,” CBC journalist told Givani.

Givani, who studied at the University of Yale with Vice President J. D. Vens, where they became good friends, accused Ford of diverting the federal conservative company and “placing ourselves as a political genius we need to take on.”

But Mr. Cherimbers, a conservative strategist, said that Puliver would also have to resist where the party lacked.

Puliver, who is known for his combat political style, has struggled with unlikely Among the common Canadian public.

He also failed to attract the support of popular conservative leaders in some provinces, such as Ford Ontario, who did not conduct Puliver’s campaigns, despite the recent victory in landscaping in the province earlier this year. However, Ford posted a photo of him and the liberal leader Mark Karni, drinking coffee.

“Last time I checked, Pierre Pielira never went out in our election,” Ford told reporters earlier this week. “The fact is that he or one of his lieutenants told each of his members:” Do not dare to get out and help. “

“Isn’t it ironic?”

Another Conservative Prime Minister Tim Houston of New Scotland – who also did not campaign for Poilievre – said that after the loss of the Federal Party, it is necessary to make a “search”.

“I think that the Conservative Party of Canada was very well repelled by people, not so well pulling people,” Houston said.

Not every Prime Minister stood in the side. The Paylieur was approved by Daniel Smith Alberta and Scott Mo Scott Mo, both Western Conservatives.

Curry Tenniku, head of the company of Ford, who publicly criticized the campaign of Puliver during the elections, angered by the federal conservatives, rejected the opinion that Ford’s failure to comply with the Pauliver, cost him the elections.

He told the BBC that for him the more problem was Poilievre’s inability to combine conservative voters in Canada.

“What is a conservative in different parts of the country can look completely different,” he said, adding that Populist and aggressive Puili -style style turned to conservatives in the West, but alienated those in the East.

“There was a lot of Trump mimicry in terms of how they introduced the company,” Mr. Tenik said.

“Donald Trump is the number one public enemy in Canada, and I don’t think it gets very good.”

He added that he believed that some “search for the soul” of the Poilievre Conservatives should include a plan for how to build a law coalition “as great and diverse as Canada.”

Asked by the journalists what you need to cure the gap, Ford replied, “All they need to do is call.”