Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In the battle between two ‘Agentic’ encoding instruments – anthropic’s Claude code and Openai’s Codex cli – the latter seems to be more good developer of the first. Is at least partly because anthropic has issued the oats a developer trying to the reverse-ingenier claude claude
Claude Code and Codex Colds are the instruments of duueling that realizes a lot of the developers of tap to the power of the patterns in the cloud to complete the coding jobs. Anthropic and Open to liberated in months – each company racing to catch the precious mental.
Source code for CYSX CYSX is available under an Apache 2.0 license allowing distribution and business use. Here you are contrast to Claude Code, which is attached to the comerphic license of the anthropic. That limits as can be modified without explicit by the company.
Antropic even “obfuscat” the source code for clabing code. In other words, Claude code code code is no soon available. When the -to-abuser developer and released the source code on GitHub, Anttropic submitted a DMCA hardest – a copyright notification that asks the code removal.
The developers On social media We weren’t pleased by the move, who say they compare the code of the CODEX code in the week or pain of Close has melting the hints of the useful of the useful, including one who leaves the CODEX CLEX Tap A. Models from rival suppliers – including anthropic.
Anthropic has not responded to a comment request. To be fair to the lab, claude code is still in beta (and a little buggy); It is possible Anttropic will set up the source code under a permissive license in the future. Companies have many reasons for the obfuscating code, security considerations be one of them.
It’s a pretrrenising pr w win to open, that in the recent months hovered by open releases to source in favor of ownership, locked. Can be emblematic of a wider change in the laboratory approach; Open CEO Samman first this year he said he believed that the company has been on the “wrong side of the story” when it comes to open source.
