Google claims that DOJ breaks can hurt US economy in battle with China

As Google On Monday, he returns to the courtroom, the company claims that the United States needs a full -form company to take on China’s main enemy and support national security in the process.

Law process on legal protection in Washington, which follows a judge resolution In August, Google held a monopoly on its main search market, the most significant antitrust ruling in the technological area since time undertaking against Microsoft More than 20 years ago.

The Justice Department called on Google to deprive its Chrome browser block and open its search data for rivals. Google said in Message in the blog On Monday, this step is not in the interest of the country, since the global battle for the rule of artificial intelligence is rapidly intensified. At the first point of Google, Google called Chinese Deepek as AI competitor.

The Doj’s proposal “will” pull up as we develop the II, and heads the State Committee, regulates the design and development of our products, “-wrote in a report by Lee-en Malholland.” It holds back American innovations at a critical stage. We are in a rigid competition with China for the next generation of technological guidance, and Google is at the forefront of US companies that make scientific and technological breakthroughs. “

Google is one of a number of US technology companies that try to reflect on the Trump administration anti -Russian classes, most of which are kept from the Biden administration. Google lost a separate antitrust case last week when a federal judge manage On Thursday, Google conducted illegal monopolies in the online advertising markets from its position between buyers and sellers.

Meta now in court Against the Federal Trade Commission, which claims that the company monopolizes the social networking market and should not have acquired Instagram and WhatsApp. Amazon also confronted with A lawsuit ftc Allegedly for the preservation of an illegal monopoly. And outside of antitrust regulation, FTC Trump on Monday sued Uber. charge A company involving deceptive exhibitions and cancellation practices are related to his subscription service.

This is a type of actions on forced implementation that the technological industry hoped to avoid when President Trump took over in January. Google, Meta, Amazon and Uber – and Top -heads of some – publicly donated Before Trump’s introductory fund, part of widespread corporate efforts to soak up the coming administration.

For Google, the trial on search results will determine the consequences of the perpetrator of the guilty since August. The three -week trial will end on May 9. Judge Amit Macht is expected to issue his ruling in August, and Google plans to appeal at this point.

“In court, we will show how unprecedented DOJ proposals go through the court’s decision, and will harm consumers of America, economy and technological leadership,” Malholland wrote.

Google plans to claim that Chrome provides freedom. The browser helps people access the Internet, and its open source code is used by other companies. One of the Doj proposals is that Google opens its search data such as search queries, clicks and results for other companies.

This “will introduce not only cybersecurity and even the risks of national security, but also increase the cost of your devices,” Google said.

The central part of Google’s task is to make a balance between it as important for American innovations, but not so important that other companies cannot compete, especially when it comes to II.

Google is likely to be conducted, as it is fueled by AI innovation for years, and will indicate the research work “Transformers”, which presented the technical architecture used in AI Chatbots like Chatgpt Openai, surprise and anthropic.

The Justice Ministry stated that Google’s “Google Agreement continues to isolate Google monopoly.” The Department plans to testify from Nick Turli, Chatgpt Product Head, and Chief Business Director Dmitry Shevelenko.

In A Message in the blog On Monday, surprise said that “the remedy is not torn”, but rather that consumers should have more choices. The company stated that phone manufacturers should be able to offer their customers a range of search options without fear of financial punishments and access restrictions. “

“Consumers deserve the best products, not just those who pay for the location,” writes surprise. “This is the only means that ensures that consumer choices can determine the winners.”

See: Google, Meta Bigh