Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Prince Harry still fighting to restore security to him and his wife, Meghan MarkleFive years after the UK Government removed it.
Harry, 40, spend two days In the Royal London Justice Courts for an appeal hearing regarding the decision to remove the couple’s safety in February 2020 when they decided to leave the UK
Duke of Sussex described the decision to The telegraph So “hard to swallow” and previously suggested that the matter was a factor in his rupture with his father, King Charles III.
Numerous People As he was leaving court on Wednesday, April 9 he was “exhausted and overwhelmed,” Harry added that his “worst fears were confirmed by all the legal disclosure in this case and that is very sad.”
Harry and Megan, 43, announced first that they were stepping back from public duties in January 2020. Then the couple met his mother Queen Elizabeth II To remove the details of their departure, with Elizabeth believing it is “vital” that they “continue to obtain effective safety,” according to a letter from the late Queen’s Private Secretary, Sir Edward Young.
But the Royal Executive Committee and VIP concluded that if Harry and Meghan lived private lives, they did not “fit easily” into the organisation’s framework. Ravec ordered their security to be removed by the end of March.
Harry and Meghan now Live in Montecito, California With their two children, son of Archie, 5, and his daughter Lilibet, 3. He saw the removal of safety as a revenge and believed it was a tactic to keep the couple trapped in the royal family.
“We were trying to create this happy house,” he told The telegraph Following the hearing.
In an effort to restore his security details, he applied for judicial review in January 2022. He ruled High Court against him in 2024, leading to the appeal process That has carried into 2025.
Sir James Eadie KcGovernment barrister, criticized Harry’s appeal in a written statement.
“(Home Office) has, and continues to treat (the Duke) in a bespoke manner. “Instead, it is brought back to the squad in appropriate circumstances, and in light of considering any specific context.”
Barrister Shaheed Fatima KC It was argued during the appeal process that Ravec did not have “the expert analysis he needed” to determine whether Harry should receive another “VIP” treatment.
“On 8 January 2020, (Harry) and his wife felt that they were being forced to step back from the role of full -time official work members of the royal family as they considered that they were not protected by the organization, but wished to continue their duties to support the late Queen as members of the privately funded royal family,” he argued in a written ban.