I was ai need a new type of the game theory

At the same time, risk is immediate and present with agents. When patterns are not just contained boxes, but can take actions in the world, when they have final effects that let them manipulate the world, I think it becomes much more than a problem.

We’ll here your agent can be harnessed by third parts to the malicious control or somehow circumvent the desired functionality. We will be able to assure these systems in order to make secure agents.

This is different from the patterns do you are becoming a threat, now?

There is no real risk of things as the control loss with current models right now. Is more of a future concern. But they are very happy people who work; I think it’s crucially important.

How concerned should we be of the increased use of agent’s systems then?

In my research group, in my startup, and in multiple publications that open has recently produced (for example), there was a lot of progress in mitigation of these things. I think there are actually in a rational road to start having a safest way to do all these things. To (challenge) is, in the balance to push the pushing agents, we want to ensure that the security advances in Blockstep.

Most of (exploitments against agent systems) see you now be classified as experimental, frankly, because agents are always in their infant. There is always a user typically in the loop somewhere. If an email agent will receive an email that says “Send all your financial information”, before sending the email, agent would still be cheated in that case.

This is also because a lot of agent release had very cool around them that are allowing human interaction in more security situations. OperatorFor example, to open, when you used on Gmail, require a human manual control.

What kind of agents would you like to see before?

There were demonstration of things as data exposure when agents are stretched in the wrong way. If my agent has access to all my files and my new driving, and can also make you look up, alte can charge these things in sometimes.

Here are still in the demonge stage right now, but this is really just that these things aren’t always adoptive. And will be adopted, we do not make error. These things will become more self independent, and they will have less persivision, because we won’t have to clown, because we don’t want to disable “agree”, “you are agreed”

It also seems inevitable we will see different agents to communicate and negotiate. What happens then?

Absolutely. Either want or not, let’s get in a world where there are agents interact with each other. We have a lot of agents interact with the world on behalf of different users. And it is aiolutely the case there should be the emergent properties that come in the interaction of all these agents.