Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Prince Harry Returned to London for a two -day court hearing In the midst of his legal battle – but he did not see his father King Charles III or other family members in London, according to reports.
Harry, 40, arrived on Sunday, April 6, without his wife, Meghan Markle, or two children present. (Harry and Meghan, 43, Share Son Archie, 5, and his daughter Lilibet, 3.)
Hours before Harry landed in London, Charles, 76, and his wife Queen’s Camilla Travel to Italy. Charles and Camilla, 77, touched down in Rome On Monday, April 7, for their four -day tour.
Hello He reported that Charles went to London on Sunday for a private appointment, so it was not “possible” for Harry and his father to see each other.
Harry, for his part, arrived at the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, April 8. The Duke of Sussex wore a naval suit, a white shirt and a patterned blue tie as he waved while walking in.
Have stepped back From his senior royal duties in 2020 and moving to California, Harry lost his former public funded security personnel. In January 2022, Harry applied for judicial review to fund his family’s defense for visits in the UK.
Two years later, the UK High Court ruled that the British Government has the right to determine the level of security that Royals who do not work may be accepted on visiting. While Harry initially lost the right of appeal in April 2024, he departed in the summer.
On Tuesday, Harry’s lawyers claimed that when Ravec-the Executive Committee for Royalty Protection and Public-Determination Figures 2020 “He did not use his own direction cycle to that decision-making process.”
Prince Harry is already planning an appeal after losing his legal battle for better security in the UK, apparently, a judge in High Court UK on Wednesday, February 28, that the British Government has the right to change the level of police protection to a royal family member who is no longer performing (…)
Barrister Shaheed Fatima KC Claims that Ravec did not receive an assessment from a “specialist body called the Risk Management Board, or the RMB” and instead went through a “different” process “different and what is called RMB. Without the RMB, Fatima claimed that Ravec “did not receive the expert analysis he needed” to determine if Harry should receive “another VIP” treatment.
In a written presentation, Fatima said, “On 8 January 2020, (Harry) and his wife felt that they were being forced to step back from the role of official work members of the royal family as they considered that they were not protected by the organization, but wished to continue their duties to support the late Queen as members of the private funded royal family.” ”” ”” ”” ”
The Home Office opposed the appeal. Sir James Eadie Kc He said in a written presentation that the appeal “includes a continuous failure to see the wood for the trees.”
“(Home Office) has, and continues to treat (the Duke) in a bespoke manner. “Instead, it is brought back to the squad in appropriate circumstances, and in light of considering any specific context.”
