Because California sb is 53 could provide significant control on the greatest ai

The Senate of California State has recently given the final approval to a new security project AI, SB 53, Sending the Governor Gavin Newsom by sign or veto.

If everything sounds familiar, this is because the nut verted another fact of security AIalso written by the Senator of Scott Wien, last year. But sb 53 is tighter than the earlier wiener, with a focus in the big companies that make more than $ 500 million annual.

I got the possibility of sb 53 discussion with my colleagues max zeffen korosec on the last episode of TECHCRUNCH PODCCAK PODAST PODAST PODES. I am Max believes the new wiener bill has a better shot of becoming law, partly because of that great company company, as well as it was approved by anthropica ai. I am

Read a preview of our conversation on the legislation of the level security and level level. (I’ve edited the transcript for length, clarity, and to make his physician slightly smarter.)

Max: Why you should take care of security legislation you go a camera in California? Let’s get this, where I am the firms I am becoming the most powerful firms in the world, and this will be potentially one of the few controls on their power.

This is much tighter than sb 1047, who took very pushback last year. But I think sb 53 always has some significant regulations on the Laborii Ai. It makes them publish safety reports for their models. If they have an incident, basically strength to report that at government. And also for these labes, they have a concern, give you a gate to revolve that to the government and not shrugged by businesses, even if a sleeve they signed in ndas.

For me, this one feels like a potentially significant control on the power of technical impression, something that we have not really had for the last couple of decades.

Kirsten: To your point of why you care in the state level, it is important to think about the fact that it is California. Each Aijor’s Aijor company is enough, if not based there, has a main finger in this state. Nicca others don’t care – I don’t want to be e-mail from people in Colorado or any thing: but it matter is specifically that is actually a HUB The Activity Ai.

My question for you, max, it’s just seems to be a lot of exception and carve out. Is it tighter but is more complicated than the previous one (bill)?

Max: In certain ways, yes. I would say the main carving out of this project is that really trying to ask small startups. And base, one of the main grants around the last legislative effort of senatoratory, who represented this protection, he has been this bill that is a california star part now.

This bill specifically applies to the developers ai that are (generated) more than $ 500 million (by) their patterns. This truly try to Target Openai, Google Deepmind, these great companies and not your run-the-mill startup.

Anthony: As you understand, if you are a star of someone’s star, you must buy some safety information but not as much as.

It is (also), the sake of the exterior landscape around the regulation and the fact that one of the great changes between the last year and this year is from a new president. The Federal Administration took a lot of a position of no regulation and companies should do what they want, to the measure that they have actually included (language) in funding States cannot have their own regulations ai. I am

I think no one is spent so far but potentially could try to get in the future. Then this could be another front in which trump administration administration and blue states are fighting.

The Furllecrunch’s Flagship Purchasher Techcrough, produced by Theresa Locon, and posts all wednesday and Friday.

SUBSCRIBE ON Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You can also follow the equity on X…………….. DORE and it Weatherat @equitopod.