Macrons offering “scientific” court evidence to prove that Bridget is a woman, says lawyer

Emanuel Macron and his wife Bridget plan to present photographic and scientific evidence to the United States to prove that Mrs. Macron is a woman.

Their lawyer says that the President of France and Mrs. Macron will present the documentation in the defamation lawsuits, which they took against the right influential influence of Condez Owance after she offered her opinion that Bridget Macron was born.

Ms. Ouns, lawyers, answered the claim.

Speaking about BBC’s glory under Podkost Fire, Makran’s lawyer in Tom Claire said that Mrs. Macron had claimed “incredibly upset” and they were “distracting” to the French president.

“I do not want to assume that it has somehow dropped it out of its game. But like anyone who juggles a career and family life when your family is attacked, it wears on you. And he is not insured because he is the president of the country,” he said.

Mr. Claire said there would be “expert testimony that will be scientific in nature,” and although he does not reveal, at this stage, his exact character, he said the couple was ready to fully demonstrate “both in general” that the accusations are false.

“Incredibly upset thinking what you need to go and expose yourself to put this type of evidence forward,” he said.

“This is a process that she will have to expose herself very publicly. But she is ready to do it. She decided to do everything she needed to set a record.

“If this trouble and discomfort that it has, it is that you need to set the record and stop it, it is 100% ready to fulfill this burden.”

Asked if the macron would supply pregnancy photos and raise children, Mr. Claire said they exist and will be presented in court where there are rules and standards.

Ms. Owns, a former commentator of the conservative American exit of the daily wire, which has millions of followers on social media, has repeatedly promoted his opinion that Bridget Macron is a man.

In March 2024, she stated that she would put her “all professional reputation” on charges.

The prosecution arose on the Internet posts Fringe years earlier, especially through a video from YouTube 2021 French bloggers Amanand Roy and Natacha.

Initially, Makran won the defamation case in France against Roy and Ray in 2024, but this ruling was abolished in the appeal in 2025 on the territory of freedom of expression, not on the basis of truth. Macrons are appealing this decision.

In July, Makran filed a lawsuit against Ms. Ouns in the United States. He claims that she “ignored all the reliable evidence that refutes her requirement in favor of the platform of known conspiracy theorists and proven flights.”

In US cases, slander against public figures, the plaintiffs must prove “true anger” – that the defendant deliberately distributed false information or acted with the ill -advised ignorance of the truth.

In August, Emmanuel Macron explained to the French magazine, the Paris match why they decided to engage in legal actions.

“It is about protecting my pride! Because it’s nonsense. This is the one who knew that she had false information and did so in order to harm, in the ideology service and established relations with extreme rights.”

Ms. Owns’s lawyers responded to the Makran’s lawsuit with the dismissal petition, claiming that it should not be filed in Delaware because it says it is not related to its business that is included in the state. They claim that they are forced to defend the case in Delaware, will lead to “significant financial and operational difficulties”.

BBC addressed the Candace Owens legal team for comment. Earlier, she said she believed she says it is true and there is nothing more American than free speech and the ability to criticize.