Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The ICC finally issued a formal response to the PCB in the row of hits after the Pakistan Cricket Board wrote twice to the International Apex body, urging the elimination of the Andy Pycroft party referee from the ongoing Asia Cup.
Pakistan faced immense humiliation on Sunday in the Asia Cup, as Indian players marched on the locker room immediately after ending the persecution as a silent protest against horror attacks in Pahalgam. Valley. However, PCB took this as a humiliating behavior and immediately launched the accusations against the party’s referee.
The PCB, headed by Mohsin Naqvi, accused the referee of the Mal Behavioral Party, as they claimed that Pakistan’s pattern, Salman Agha, was not informed about the hand -on -hand deception, while the Indian pattern, Suryakumar yadavIt was.
Your daily dose of cricket!
According to a report to PTI, ICC has ruled out all these statements and clearly stated that they had discovered that Pycroft followed all the rules and regulations in the “T.” ICC has praised Andy Pycroft rather for saving the two captains of shame during the game launch. The body of the apex also washed hands of the problem as he pushed him to the ACC.
According to ICC claims, the ACC officials and the tournament are responsible for conducting matters such as the hand -strokes in the field, saying that the ICC or the party referee has no rule to play. Ironically, the ACC is also headed by the PCB head, Mohsin Naqvi.
1) The ICC research was performed on the basis of the information provided in the report presented by the PCB. We took the report in nominal value and noted that no documentation or support tests were provided. The PCB had every opportunity to file a statement from his team members next to the initial report, but chose not to do it.
2) After our investigation, we determined that there was no case to respond to Match’s referee for misconduct. The actions taken by the coincidence referee were, after clear addresses by the manager of the ACC venue, were consistent with the way a party referee would deal with such a problem, not to have time to do anything more (minutes before launch).
3) Mr. Pycroft pledged to preserve the sanctity of the launch and to avoid any possible shame that could arise.
4) The party referee did not blame it in any way.
5) It is not the role of the referee of the regulating party no team or protocols of the tournament that have been agreed outside the play area; This is a matter for tournament organizers and relevant team managers.
6) It seems that the actual concern or complaint of the PCB is related to the actual decision that the hand was not struck. Therefore, the PCB should direct these complaints to the tournament organizer and those who made the real decision (who was not the referee). ICC does not play a role in this ..
The United Arab Emirates won the launch and first opted for Bol. Its main purpose was to keep the opposition marker under control. The bowls did a commendable work, as they restricted Pakistan to less than 150.
The first advances of the two operators and then the sudden collapse of a medium order caused by Simranjit Singh had broken the back of the Pakistan’s shake order. But,, Sheen AfricaThe last cameo brought Pakistan to a respectable score of 146/9.
Pakistan’s bowls now have a hard work to do, as they have to defend the goal of 147 in front of the United Arab Emirate Battle Line, which could be a great challenge with their skills in these modest persecutions.
Also read: See: The PCB “Humiliate” Celebrate while Andy Pycroft apologizes to Pakistan by Non-Handshake Row