The owner of the Think Third Media Ses Google Over a summary

Google faces a new leg accusing the company of illegal content using the editor’s content to create a summary I harm their business.

Cause it comes from the average (PMC), which ownership of industry, Bib’s ballot, variety, reporter Hollywood, and art practice, and art. While Penke’s clothing is the first intended for Google and their company company company to show the Ai-Generated summary in search, both Publishes and it authors they saddle other companies ai on related copyright concerns.

Since the launch of its reviewed the past year, Google has been criticized to threaten the business models of the same publications that approaches to provide the required content to create a summary and accurate answers.

The new docuia goes to accuse: Google to continue to “Wising their PMC’s Content” and to use that content of their own models.

Google Spokesperson José Castañeda said in a search AGA that the Google “most useful” search and create “new opportunities to be discovered”.

“Every day, gentlemen million cars on the web, and fixing the traffic in a sites,” castañe said. “We will defend against these practions.

The cause that sustains that as long as you allow their access sites to a business website “that is sickened the Product in this sharpening the warrant.”

“As a condition of the editor’s content of the editor, goes the editors to provide for the only way to operate the operation by the operation of the quests, which could be” devastating. “

Cause that also says the thoughts seen “the recruits in clicks by Google searches from the Google started to break down the riot.” That means that the seller of the cloth, and also threatened, the revenue of affair, the revenue says: “These revenue plans to people actually Visit visiting Pmp sites. “

And while Google has pushed the complaint you will reduce traffic, law says: “Google has not proposed not a research information.”

The Penske Dress comes after Google Dodged – while a federal judge had earned the company has acting illegal to maintain a searchet of monopolia, the judge it does not have to order the company to break their businesses (For example by selling chrome), due to a part to growing competition in AI.