Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah State College emphasizes campus security crisis

Atrocious Murder founder Turning Point Charlie Kirk This week, at the Utah State College event, they make it clear that conservative speakers are not safe in America’s towns, and that something needs to be done to change it.

The Trump administration has tools in the barn to solve this problem, but before we before let’s see how bad everything got.

Speakers from the main conservative promise that after the murder of Charlie Kirk they will “be silent”

The term “veto Hecler” is a relative newcomer in English. He was invented in 1965 by Professor of Law University Harry Calwen in his book “Negro and First Amendment”.

Calveen described how state bodies denied civil rights participants to collect from the threats made against them, and the costs associated with protecting these threats. Thus, Hemler gets veto on the event.

Soon 60 years and veto Hecler are alive and healthy, but today it is not used for the silence of the left but the right. And this week he was silent by Charlie Kirk forever, at a delicate age of 31 years.

This is the veto Hecler under the sight.

Over the years, when conservatives such as kirk, Ben Shapiro or Jack Posobik appear on the college campus, threats against them are so serious that the college should incur security. And after that, these costs will be even more impossible.

Republican Republican College of Boston University requires security, accountable after Charlie Kirk’s murder

Meanwhile, members of terrorist meteorists and supporters of police killers, such as Mumia Abu Jamal, regularly perform in our higher education institutions, with virtually no protest.

Today, conservative student groups who want to invite speakers to their school are faced with almost insurmountable problems in the organization of defense.

Add to this the fact that the prominent conservative speakers can, quite understandable, decide not to risk appearing in colleges, not from cowardly, but of common sense.

This is the veto Hecler under the sight.

There are three ways that Trump administration can act to ensure that conservative speakers and their audience will be safe when they appear in colleges. Let’s take everyone in turn.

For the first, it’s heavy force. Just as the government spent resources in the 1960s to protect the rights of the first amendment of civil rights protesters, it must also protect today’s conservative speakers, perhaps with the National Guard.

At least for a period of time, the government could compensate for the load faced by the colleges that take conservatives, and it is possible to restore the value that discussion and ideological diversity-good things.

Secondly, now, when Charlie Kirk’s killer was inspired by Antifa, the law enforcement agencies should be the center of attention to break the well-organized Antifa machine, which terrorizes not only colleges but also whole cities such as Portland and Seattle.

Just a few years ago, the weekend representative Jerry Nadler, Dn.Y., told the press that Antifa is a myth. To this day there are thoughtless morons that tremble, saying, “How can anti -fascism be bad?” Even if federal buildings are burned in the masks of criminals.

Indeed, the fascism, which Kirk’s enemies dreamed of enemies, directly stated that he was fighting his cold and cowardly act.

Thanks to the courageous reporting of journalists such as Andy NGO, we absolutely know that Antifa not only exists, but also a multi -state, even an international organization that seeks to use violence to achieve its distant political goals. Just as the FBI worked on the counteract -key -clan, when he tried to intimidate and stop the protests of civil rights in the 1960s, today the antifa should be treated in the same way.

Finally, the Trump administration wisely used the threat of reducing federal financing in the college for inability to fight anti -Semitism. Similar efforts can make the ideological diversity protected at our universities.

Click here to get an extra judgment Fox News

Such a measure can make it clear that conservative students and organizations on the campus will contact if their institution either refuses to allow them to hold events or claims that it is too expensive.

Charlie Kirk knew too well the risks, but despite this, he made himself a target, he sat in big, wide open squares and invited all the visitors, including the one who made him an American martyrs.

Charlie’s victim should not be in vain. This should be a call for Clarion so that any student or speaker can participate in political discourse without fear of violence or even death.

Like he lived, Charlie Kirk’s name should be synonymous with the defense of free speech.

Time to act now, and with President Trump in the White House, you can actually take the necessary actions.

Click here to read away from David Marcus