California is undergoing a law -enforcement bill during raids

California lawmakers Taken the measure that would forbid the majority of law enforcement agencies cover their faces while working in response to recent immigration raids in the Los -Andgeles area, where some federal agents covered their faces and hid their faces.

The bill approved on Thursday is now heading to the desk of Democrat Gavin News Governor. Although, if he signs it in the law, it is unclear whether the state may imply a ban on federal agents who raid and arrests in local enterprises that are within the framework President Donald Trump Mass deportation plan.

The bill is the first of its kind to go through the state legislative body, although similar legislation was adopted in several states, including Tennessee, Michigan, Illinois, New York, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. The Democrats on the Capitolian hill also offered a ban on law enforcement masks.

According to the bill, local and federal officers, including on immigration issues, are forbidden to wear neck, ski masks and other individual coatings, carrying out official business.

Los -Andgeles county pushes to ban law enforcement agencies to hide his identity while at work

Exceptions will be authorized for secret, medical masks such as N95 respirators or tactical transmission.

Newsom has about a month Sign the law in the law. While he criticized the use of federal agents during arrests, he also raised questions over the summer about the powers of the state over federal agents.

Since June, federal agents conducted immigration raids in Southern California, causing protests and subsequent federal deployment of the National Guard and Marines.

Proponents of the bill stated that the proposal was needed after the Supreme Court ruling earlier this week, which allows the federal government to restore extensive immigration raids in the Los -Andgeles, which also allows agents to focus on migrants based on things such as race or ethnic affiliation, speaking in Spanish or presence in certain places.

Democrat Juan Karila said the Scotus resolution “effectively allows the federal agents to stop the suspects, based solely on their race, language or work.”

Massachusetts Bill would force the glaciers to reveal

“How should anyone believe that they are law enforcement officers, not disguise individuals who try to steal you?” he said on the eve of the vote. “Imagine an absolute fear to pull it under a group of masked people.”

Proponents of the bill also referred to the opinion of the Constitutional Rights Expert Erwin Chemyrinsky at the University of California, Berkeley. He wrote in the opinion published in the Bee Sacramento that the state cannot directly regulate the federal government, but that does not mean that federal employees can ignore state rules, “if it does not significantly interfere with the fulfillment of its duties.”

“The agents of the Leaders have never worn the masks before the detention of people, and this has never caused problems. Other officers of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies have faced the public because they do not wear masks on the streets,” he wrote.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Republican lawmakers and law enforcement agencies claim that the legislation will only make work more dangerous for officers.

“Bad guys wear masks because they don’t want to get. Good guys wear masks because they don’t want to kill,” said GOP Senator Kelly Seiart.

Trump administration representatives tried to defend the practice of covering the person by stating this Federal Immigration Agents They faced increased persecution in public and online.

But others, including several general lawyers, claim that the use of face masks causes fear among the public and must be stopped.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.